---

Few words in Christianity are as heavily loaded as hell.
Fire. Torment. Condemnation. Eternal separation from God.
For many people, it seems obvious that the Bible describes exactly this one place.
But when we look at the Hebrew and Greek texts, things become more complicated.

Because there we do not encounter one single term meaning “hell.”
Instead, we find several different words and images that, in some translations,
have been grouped together under the same term:

Sheol. Hades. Gehenna. Tartarus. The lake of fire.

And they do not mean the same thing.

---

One Word — Many Completely Different Ideas

When we hear the word “hell” today, we usually think of a place of eternal torment after death.
But that fully developed image should not simply be projected backwards onto every biblical passage.
Because the texts speak of different places, states, and images of judgement.

When all of them are translated with the same word, the differences disappear.
And suddenly something emerges that is far less clear in the original texts:

one single, all-encompassing hell.

---

Sheol — The Realm of the Dead

The Hebrew word Sheol appears many times in the Old Testament.
It refers to the realm of the dead, or more broadly to the domain of death.

And something is worth noting:

It is not only wicked people who go there.
The righteous also expect to descend into Sheol.

Sheol therefore does not function like the later idea of a hell to which only the “damned” are sent.
First and foremost, it is an image of death, darkness, and the end of earthly life.

A moral division into heaven for the good and hell for the wicked cannot simply be derived from it.

---

Hades — The Greek Realm of the Dead

In the Greek New Testament, we encounter Hades.

This term too basically refers to the realm of the dead.
There is therefore a clear connection with the Sheol of the Old Testament.

In the Greek translation of the Old Testament, Sheol was often rendered as Hades.

That matters. Because when an English Bible uses the word “hell” in a particular passage, the underlying term may actually be one that was originally associated simply with the realm of the dead.

And in our minds, a realm of the dead can quickly become a place of eternal torment.

But that is already interpretation. Not merely translation.

Gehenna — A Real Valley Outside Jerusalem

Things become especially interesting with Gehenna.

The Greek word goes back to Ge-Hinnom, the Valley of Hinnom to the south or south-west of Jerusalem.

In the Old Testament, this place was associated with dark memories. In earlier times, child sacrifices had taken place there. Prophets such as Jeremiah condemned these practices sharply and connected the valley with judgement.

As a result, Ge-Hinnom became a powerful image:

of judgement, death, and rejection.

So when Jesus speaks of Gehenna, he is not using a meaningless fantasy word.

His listeners knew this place.
They knew its history.
They knew the prophetic imagery connected with it.

That is why this Jewish world of imagery should be understood first, before Gehenna is automatically turned into an otherworldly torture chamber for immortal souls.

---

Tartarus — And Why It Has Nothing to Do with Deceased Human Beings

Another term appears only once in the New Testament.

In 2 Peter 2:4, angels who sinned are described as being cast into a dark place and kept there for judgement. The underlying Greek verb is connected with Tartarus.

The crucial point is:

This passage is about angels.

Not deceased human beings.
Not people who did not accept Jesus.
Not a general hell for unbelievers.

To simply equate Tartarus with the ordinary Christian idea of hell therefore goes beyond what the text actually says.

---

And Then There Is the Lake of Fire

The lake of fire is something different again. It appears only in Revelation.

Among those cast into it are:

• the beast
• the false prophet
• the adversary
• death
• Hades
• and finally those whose names are not found in the Book of Life

The lake of fire is called the “second death.”

That alone distinguishes it from the traditional idea of hell, in which people continue to exist endlessly as immortal souls and are tormented forever.

Because Revelation calls it:

Death.Nicht „ewiges Leben unter schlechten Bedingungen“.

---

A Strange Scene

What is especially striking is this:

An abstract state such as death cannot literally burn.
Nor can the realm of the dead burn like a physical being.

So we are clearly dealing with highly symbolic imagery.
And that is exactly why we should be careful about suddenly reading individual elements in a completely literal way.

---

Who Is Written in the Book of Life?

Revelation 20 speaks of people whose names are not found in the Book of Life.
But here too, caution is needed as soon as people begin drawing up definitive lists.

The text does not say:
“All non-Christians are not written in it.”

It does not say:
“Anyone with the wrong religion is not written in it.”

Nor does it provide a simple formula by which we could determine from the outside exactly who belongs and who does not.
The idea that religious affiliation allows us to know with certainty who will end up in the lake of fire therefore goes beyond what the text itself says.

---

Why the Word “Hell” Can Be So Problematic

The real problem is not that the English word “hell” is somehow forbidden.

The problem begins when this one word swallows up several very different biblical terms.

Then:

Sheol,
Hades,
Gehenna,
Tartarus,
and the lake of fire

all become one single place.

And afterwards, the features of this later composite image are read back into every individual biblical passage.

That creates a cycle:

The translation creates an image — and that image then determines how we understand the translation.

---

Perhaps We Should Separate the Individual Images Again

What happens when we do that?

Then we discover:

Sheol speaks of death.
Hades of the realm of the dead.
Gehenna carries the history of a real valley and the language of prophetic judgement.
Tartarus concerns fallen angels.
The lake of fire belongs to the highly symbolic vision of Revelation.

Of course, these texts speak of death and judgement. Their severity should not be explained away.

But something else is just as important:
Judgement is not automatically the same thing as the later doctrine of an eternal hell.

---

What the Text Does Not Automatically Support

From these terms alone, we cannot simply conclude:

For such a far-reaching doctrine, the text would need to be very clear.
Instead, we encounter different terms, different contexts, and a wealth of prophetic imagery.
That should at least make us curious.
Perhaps also a little cautious about answers that are too simple.

---

And What Is God’s Ultimate Purpose?

When we speak about judgement, death, and hell, another biblical theme must not be lost:

Reconciliation.

Paul writes that through Christ, God reconciled us to himself and gave us the ministry of reconciliation. Elsewhere, this perspective is widened even further: God’s work does not point towards eternal separation, but towards restoration and reconciliation.

That raises the question:

Can eternal condemnation really be God’s final purpose if reconciliation stands at the centre of his work?

Judgement and reconciliation do not have to contradict each other.
Judgement can expose, separate, correct, and bring an end to what is destructive.
But that does not mean the goal has to be destruction. It can be healing.
And this is exactly where the whole discussion about Sheol, Gehenna, Hades, and the lake of fire begins to point in a different direction:

Then the question is not only:
“What does God save us from?”

but also:
“Where is God leading his creation?”

---

My Conclusion