---

There are words of Jesus that can stay with you.

Fire. Judgement. Gehenna. Weeping and gnashing of teeth.

If you grew up with the traditional idea of heaven and hell, passages like these can almost automatically bring a certain picture to mind:

People die.
Some go to God.
Others are punished forever.

For a long time, I also thought that this was exactly what Jesus was talking about. But at some point, I wanted to look more closely:

Is that picture really in the text — or am I already bringing it with me when I read it?

One term became especially important to me:

Gehenna.

Because where English Bibles often write “hell”, the Greek text does not use our modern English word “hell”, but a specific term with a history of its own. And for me, that history changes the way I read these passages.

---

Gehenna or Hell — Are They Really the Same Thing?

---

---

And What About Salvation for All?

The fact that Jesus initially spoke to Israel does not mean that God’s salvation remains limited to Israel.
Paul, in particular, later expands the perspective far beyond Israel and speaks of Christ in relation to all humanity.

That is why I would distinguish between two levels:

This distinction helps me not to remove every statement of Jesus from its historical context and immediately turn it into a universal doctrine of the afterlife for every person in every age.

Der entscheidende Punkt

Für mich lautet die Frage deshalb nicht:

The Crucial Point

For me, the question is therefore not:

“Why does Jesus suddenly start talking about hell?” But rather: “What does Jesus mean by Gehenna?”

---

What Is Ge-Hinnom?

To understand why Jesus speaks of Gehenna at all, it is worth looking at the place behind the name.

The history of Ge-Hinnom is anything but harmless.

A Valley with a Dark Past

In the Old Testament, the Valley of Hinnom appears in connection with practices that the biblical writers strongly condemn.
Foreign gods were worshipped there, and sacrifices were offered. Most disturbing are the accounts of children being made to pass through fire in connection with these cults.

Of King Ahaz, for example, it says:

The valley therefore came to carry a very dark meaning. It was not merely a geographical place outside Jerusalem,
but became associated with idolatry, violence, shame, and judgement.

And This Is the Place Jesus Names

For me, that is crucial when we talk about hell. When Jesus speaks of Gehenna,
he is not introducing a completely new term that his listeners had to learn as a place in the afterlife.

He is naming a place whose history they already knew.

That is why I ask:

For me, it makes more sense to first understand what images and memories Ge-Hinnom would have evoked at the time.
Only then can we meaningfully ask what Jesus was actually warning about.

What Was Topheth?

---

Jesus Speaks of Judgement in Connection with Gehenna

When Jesus speaks of Gehenna, he is referring to a real place near Jerusalem: the Valley of Hinnom.
For me, that is why it is important to read his words first within their historical and Jewish context — rather than automatically treating them as a description of an endless hell in the afterlife.

In Luke 12, Jesus says:

To me, that does not sound like people continuing to live after death in order to be tormented endlessly.
Rather, the statement fits with the idea of judgement, exclusion, and consequence.

Jesus is preparing his disciples for the possibility of persecution and even death.
At the same time, he warns them not to take God’s judgement lightly.

Gehenna therefore stands in connection with the coming Messianic Kingdom, which is established on earth (see Revelation 21:2), and with the judgements connected with its coming.

In this reading, someone who falls under this judgement initially has no share in that coming Kingdom.

But that does not automatically mean that the final destiny of that person for all eternity is being described.

That is why I would not simply equate Luke 12:4–5 with an eternal hell.

The text speaks about judgement.
But it does not explicitly say that people remain consciously in Gehenna after death and suffer there forever.

And the coming Kingdom spoken of in the Gospels is not described as humanity escaping from the earth, but as God’s reign being established on the earth.

For me, that leads to a different picture:

Gehenna is a symbol of judgement with a concrete historical background
and not an automatic, ready-made proof of an endless hell.

---

What Is the “Unquenchable Fire”?

One of Jesus’ strongest statements appears in Mark 9:

At first glance, this sounds like a clear description of hell:

A fire that does not go out.
A worm that does not die.
Gehenna.

It is no wonder that this passage is often read as proof of endless torment in hell. But Jesus is not introducing completely new imagery here.
He is drawing on words from Isaiah 66.

There it says:

And this is where an important distinction becomes visible to me:

Isaiah speaks of dead bodies.

Not of people who remain alive in the flames and consciously suffer there without end.
The image is one of death, fire, and decay. That gives Jesus’ words about Gehenna a very different background for me.

Jesus Draws on a Familiar Image of Judgement

Isaiah 66 stands in the context of God’s coming reign and the renewal of Jerusalem.
That makes it likely, in my view, that Jesus is deliberately reminding his listeners of this prophetic imagery.

Gehenna therefore does not have to refer to a supernatural place of torture after death, but can be understood as an image of judgement, exclusion,
and the consequences of rebellion against God’s order.

The imagery remains serious. But it does not automatically say:

What Does “Unquenchable” Mean?

I would also be careful not to equate the word “unquenchable” too quickly with “burning without end”.
A fire can be unquenchable because no one can stop it until it has fulfilled its purpose.

That is why, for me, the crucial question is not only:

How long does the fire burn?
But also:
What is actually being burned?
Perhaps the dead bodies?

If Isaiah is speaking of corpses, then the emphasis is not on endless torment, but on a judgement that cannot be prevented.

And What About the Worm That Does Not Die?

I understand the image of the worm in a similar way. Isaiah is describing decay.

For me, this therefore looks more like an image of complete judgement than of immortal human beings or immortal worms.

---

And How Does This Fit with the Messianic Kingdom?

This language belongs within the broader framework of the biblical promises concerning the coming Kingdom of God.
Jesus repeatedly speaks of God’s reign becoming visible.

When Gehenna and Isaiah 66 are read within this framework, what emerges for me is a picture of judgement on earth and in connection with Jerusalem — not of an invisible hell somewhere in the afterlife.

In context, the text speaks of this:

That does not automatically mean that a person’s final destiny has been decided for all eternity.

---

What Does This Mean for the Question of Hell?

For me, these verses therefore do not prove an endless hell.

They certainly speak of:

• judgement
• consequences
• death
• Gehenna
• fire
• exclusion

But they do not explicitly speak of:

conscious existence in endless torment.

And that distinction is crucial for me. Jesus’ language is powerful and uncompromising.
But strong language is not automatically a complete doctrine of the afterlife.

---

Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth — Really a Picture of Eternal Torment in Hell?

When the Bible speaks of “weeping and gnashing of teeth”, it can quickly bring to mind an image of eternal torment.
But this is exactly where it is worth being careful not to load the text with later ideas about hell.

In Luke 13, the scene is not initially about the dead in Gehenna, but about people who are outside the Kingdom and see others taking part in it:

The image is severe. It is about exclusion, disappointment, and judgement. But the text does not say that these people are being endlessly tortured as immortal souls.
The context points instead towards the establishment of the Messianic Kingdom.
Jerusalem, the Kingdom, and prophetic language of judgement form the background.

The weeping and gnashing of teeth happens outside the door, not in an otherworldly torture chamber.

That is important.

Because a scene of exclusion is often turned immediately into a doctrine of eternal condemnation.
But the text itself does not make that move.

Nor does it tell us here that this condition is fixed for all eternity.
The judgement belongs to the transition between the aeons — the ending of one order and the beginning of another.

And something else stands out:

People say to him:

The Fiery Furnace in the Parable of the Weeds

Similar language appears in Matthew 13:

Here too, people often immediately think of an eternal hell.

But first, Jesus is speaking about the completion of the aeon and about his Kingdom.
The scene therefore belongs within the context of the coming Messianic Kingdom.

Anyone who automatically reads endless torment of immortal souls into this passage is already assuming something the text itself does not explain.
The people being described are part of an earthly scene of judgement. If they are mortal human beings, they cannot be physically tormented without end.

The connection with Gehenna is also significant. The Valley of Hinnom lay just outside Jerusalem and had already become, in the prophets, an image of judgement, death, and rejected bodies. Jesus draws on this familiar world of imagery.

That is why it is at least possible that the fire and the weeping and gnashing of teeth are not describing exactly the same thing: while judgement is carried out and bodies are destroyed, others stand outside the Kingdom and experience the loss of what they can see before them.

The texts, however, do not give us a complete sequence of events.

Who Are the Rejected?

The text does not give us a simple checklist for that either.
The terms Jesus uses speak of lawlessness, injustice, and people who, despite their religious proximity, do not truly belong to him.

The text does not say that. On the contrary, Luke 13 in particular challenges the idea that religious affiliation automatically guarantees God’s favour.
Anyone who wants to understand whom Jesus means by the “workers of lawlessness” has to look at the wider context rather than reduce the passage to a simple religious label.

Religious Proximity Does Not Protect Us from Responsibility

What I find especially interesting is who is standing outside in this story.

So they are not complete strangers to Jesus. They even appeal to their closeness to him — and yet they are rejected.
That does not fit well with the simple formula:

Jesus is speaking here precisely to people who feel religiously secure.
So the decisive question does not seem to be only:

“Which group do I belong to?” But rather: “How do I live?”

---

And Who Is Meant by “Godless”?

Here too, I would not too quickly say:

In the biblical context, “godless” can also describe someone whose behaviour is unjust, destructive, or morally corrupt.
Psalm 112, for example, contrasts a person who is gracious, acts justly, and gives to the poor with another who reacts with bitterness.

So the contrast is more like:

Das ist ein wichtiger Unterschied.

---

Who, Then, Is Under Judgement?

The texts speak of:

But they do not give us a complete list that allows us to sort people into categories today.

That is why I do not want to claim:

And certainly not:

Jesus himself repeatedly challenges that kind of certainty.

I Actually Find That Quite Liberating

Not because judgement becomes meaningless.
But because none of us is given the task of deciding the final fate of other people.

---

What Does This Mean for the Gnashing of Teeth?

Für mich ergibt sich daraus ein zurückhaltenderes Bild:

For me, this leads to a more cautious understanding:

Weeping and gnashing of teeth describes a real and painful reaction to judgement and exclusion.

It can mean grief.
Anger.
Frustration.
Realisation.

But:

gnashing of teeth = eternal torment in hell

is not an equation the text itself gives us.

---

My Main Point

Jesus’ statements about judgement are serious. They are not meant to reassure us in the sense of:

Quite the opposite. Our actions have consequences. Injustice is not simply overlooked.

But judgement is not automatically the same as:

endless conscious torment without any hope.

And perhaps that is exactly the distinction we need to learn again when reading passages like these:

So What Does Gehenna Mean?

In short:

A real place with a troubled history.
A place that, within the biblical tradition, became associated with idolatry, violence, shame, and judgement.
Jesus draws on this term and connects it with very serious warnings.

But that does not automatically mean a supernatural hell in which people are tormented endlessly after death.

---

What I Take Away from These Passages

The longer I spend with these texts, the less convincing I find the simple equation:

The historical and biblical context is simply too concrete for that.
Jesus speaks in a language his listeners already knew.

He draws on images from the prophets.
He speaks of judgement and responsibility.
And he warns people against being too secure in their own position.

That is serious enough. I do not need to turn it into an even more cruel message.

---

My Conclusion